http://blogs.birminghampost.co.uk/business/

Is Tata about to float JLR?

By David Bailey on Mar 4, 12 09:31 PM in Automotive


Is Tata about to float JLR? That's the question that a few readers have been asking me after a recent report by Reuters in India and similar suggestion by The Economic Times.

JLR, remember, contributed a whopping 95% of the overall profit of Tata Motors in the last quarter. The reports suggest that a minority listing for JLR would enable Tata to bank a decent profit on the $2.3 billion purchase price that Tata paid for JLR back in 2008.

With no replacement yet found for the CEO of Tata Motors, who stepped down last September, the view in such pieces is that instead of searching for synergies, Tata could split JLR out and sell off a minority of its shares through an initial public offering (IPO). That could raise cash and help Tata pare down its $4 billion debt.

In addition, a stock market listing would not mean JLR severing its Indian links as Tata would remain the majority owner, and JLR could still look to expand sales and assembly in India.

So far so good, perhaps. But would a listing in fact mean Tata was getting ready to cash in on its 2008 purchase of JLR and get out completely while the going seems good?

Here the argument is that so far Tata has ridden on the back of Ford's huge investments in new models (the XF, the XJ and the Range Rover Evoque) and is now effectively on its own. Hence the recently announced doubling of investment in new model development (which I didn't quite understand as I thought Tata/JLR were already investing £1.5 billion a year anyway).

One critical commentator (Paul Kelly) on my regular blog noted as long back as mid 2011, 'the word of those in the know is Tata is planning a float, effectively a sale of JLR in 2012. A company wishing to sell something... will put the best shine on the thing it's trying to hock. This is what is happening with JLR and its '1 billion pounds profit'... but I doubt Tata will manage the same in 2012. They're stuck with a rapidly depreciating 'asset' that needs ultimately tens of billions of pounds of investment over the next decade, to compete, let alone surpass, the big three Germans - BMW, Mercedes-Benz and VW Group. Tata ain't going to do it (invest tens of billions of pounds over a decade horizon), and those who really know the industry know it too, hence the plan for a stock market float or trade sale in 2012.'

And more recently Paul has offered an interesting perspective in a comment on a recent blog (which can be read here - scroll down to the comments). He is effectively suggesting a 'pump and dump' operation, with Tata talking up the 'asset' - JLR - to be got rid off ('pump'),then leaving it in the hands of punters through an IPO ('dump').

Where this line of argument is right is that Tata/JLR are indeed now effectively on their own after reaping the benefits of massive Ford investment in new model development, and that from here on in big money will be needed to develop new platforms and engines, including a much-needed entry-level BMW 3-series competitor for Jaguar.

What's right as well is that JLR as it is currently set up is too small - producing some 300,000 units at best this year against BMW at well over 1 million, and its exceptionally large margins on cars produced in the last quarter (at some 20%) may well not be sustainable over time. Over the medium term I'd argue a scale of 600,000+ at high margins is needed to get to a sustainable position in terms of cost recovery of investment in new models and engines.

What's also right is that the Reuters piece may well indeed be a kite-flying exercise by Tata to see what the reaction is like.

But where I start to disagree with Paul is that Tata's track record with its major acquisitions is actually as a long-term, committed owner as long as there is growth potential. And I don't doubt that's the case with JLR as well given the latter's success in emerging markets. Indeed, Tata has committed serious money to JLR so far. What's not so clear is whether it can do that for the long-term purely on its own.

So, while a float may seem possible - even likely - I still think Tata will keep a majority stake and look for outside investment, and indeed partners for JLR in terms of engine and new model development (BMW is already cooperating with Peugeot on engine development, Daimler Benz with Renault-Nissan, Bentley and Porsche can draw on key VW technology and so on).

In this sense, floating off JLR might not be bad for the car maker as long as Tata remained the majority owner, thus ensuring no battles for control or infection of short-termism (a killer in the auto industry where long-term, committed and patient financing is needed to bring new cars to market). After all, it was activist investors who pressed for a demerger of Cadbury Schweppes which ultimately led to Cadbury being vulnerable to take over as it was so small.

So, yes a partial float may be on the cards, with Tata retaining majority ownership. The latter is critical for JLR staying as one entity and continuing to invest for the long-term.

Professor David Bailey works at Coventry University Business School.


Business authors

David Bailey

David Bailey - Professor of Industrial Strategy at the Aston Business School, Birmingham
My postings | David Bailey's RSS feed My feed

Stuart Pemble

Stuart Pemble - Construction Lawyer, Mills & Reeve
My postings | Stuart Pemble's RSS feed My feed

John Clancy

John Clancy - Birmingham City Councillor and director of mediafuturesalert.com and justliteracy.com
My postings | John Clancy's RSS feed My feed

John Samuels

John Samuels - Professor of Business Finance, Birmingham Business School
My postings | John Samuels's RSS feed My feed

Chris Tomlinson

Chris Tomlinson - Chris Tomlinson is the founder of social media and online PR agency Friend (frienddigital.com)
My postings | Chris Tomlinson's RSS feed My feed

Andrew Whitehead

Andrew Whitehead - Senior partner at law firm SGH Martineau, leading the firm's Energy & Climate Change practice.
My postings | Andrew Whitehead's RSS feed My feed

Keith Gabriel

Keith Gabriel - A Birmingham-based PR Account Manager
My postings | Keith Gabriel's RSS feed My feed

Beverley Nielsen

Beverley Nielsen - Lecturer, Design Management, at the Birmingham Institute of Art & Design, BCU
My postings  | Beverley Nielsen'a RSS feed My feed

Mike Loftus

Mike Loftus - Director of News from the Future Ltd. Writing on the trials of setting up your own business
My postings | Mike Loftus's RSS feed My feed

Richard Halstead

Richard Halstead - Midlands region director for EEF, the manufacturers organisation.
My postings | Richard Halstead's RSS feed My feed

Karl Edge

Karl Edge - partner at KPMG in Birmingham, specialising in automotive, manufacturing and house building sectors.
My postings | Karl Edge's RSS feed My feed

Peter Owen

Peter Owen - Managing director for construction firm Willmott Dixon Midlands.
My postings | Peter Owen's RSS feed My feed

Dr Steven McCabe

Dr Steven McCabe - director of research degrees for Birmingham City Business School.
My postings | Dr Steven McCabe's RSS feed My feed

Francis Greene

Francis Greene - Professor of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, at the University of Birmingham.
My postings

Alan Gilmour

Alan Gilmour - Director at Cogent Elliott, experienced in marketing, brand development and customer relationship management.
My postings

Paul Noon

Paul Noon - Paul Noon, OBE, West Midlands International Trade Director at UK Trade & Investment.
My postings

Latest Birmingham Post Lifestyle blog

Lifestyle Blog

Birmingham Post staff and guest bloggers from the midlands give you the lowdown on what's happening in your region and some musings on culture in the UK and beyond.

Keep up to date

Sponsored Links